From the time we begin school as very young students we learn to concentrate on grades. Online instructors sometimes receive questions such as “how much do I need to do to get an A” exposing an interest in the destination, not the journey ahead. Educator John Orlando hopes that by setting opportunities to learn from mistakes we can “reverse the trend” of students “demoralized by failure, and focused more on the grade than the education.”
Here are some techniques on Restructuring Failure for Learning
Considering Instructional Strategies
Through practical methods to class activities and assignments, students can experience trial and error, cycles of draft and revision, while learning along the way. Building these kinds of choices into online courses draws student attention to the process, as well as the final product.
Project-based assignments: have a course that leveraged group projects as learning activities. Student design teams work through various stages of project development, each one to post for the rest of the class to review and critique in discussion forums. Instructors will review and critique them. Finding flaws each week is part of the process and allow for a more improved project each week. Since all of the projects and critiques are visible to the class, students will learn from other groups’ mistakes as well. The University of Maryland University College provides a list of additional advantages of online project-based learning.
Revision-based assignments: Have you ever had the chance to revise an assignment you already submitted, and turn it back in for re-evaluation? This kind of assignment, with sufficient feedback from an instructor, can positively affect student learning. Projects and papers could be set up with draft and final submissions. Orlando tells the story, for example, of a popular professor also known for being a tough grader, although all of his students receive A’s. This instructor’s technique is that “when a student hands in a paper he is given comments and told to rewrite it over and over until it is an A-quality paper. Only then is it accepted.” A needed writing course at The George Washington University presents another example of learning “through pre-draft, preparation, drafts, and revisions based on instructor’s advice and classmates’ comments.”
Games and Simulations: The implementation of learning games and training simulations are two more strategies that stimulate students to learn through their mistakes. Games commonly include the potential for layers of both success and failure, and are becoming increasingly popular. Research published last year in the International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations indicates that while game-based “experiences of failure” may frustrate students, they can also result to learning through a student’s “increased motivation to try a different strategy.” Simulators, which may integrate game-like features, are also used in a wide range of fields from aviation to nursing, to provide low-risk opportunities for learners to fail, and learn from the mistakes leading to that failure, before moving into higher-risk training and work environments.
Making it Meaningful
It’s the process of learning from failure that is vital to keep in mind, and the need to obtain passing grades cannot be dismissed. The design of course activities and assessments could establish ways for students to learn from mistakes. Making mistakes isn’t the goal, but creating a chance for learning from those that do happen can be powerful. This takes extra effort to achieve – it’s more than just acknowledging that a mistake occurred.
Reflection: What would you have done differently? What will you do differently next time? These questions are often part of reflective learning activities. Writing it all down can help and is not a new idea in education as journaling assignments have made their way to blogs. A guide for student reflective writing from Edith Cowan University, available on the Learning Objects Community site, highlights possible uses of blogs, portfolios, and journals that help students “indicate areas of particular difficulty or interest, learning preferences, breakthroughs and set-backs” encountered in their own work.
Feedback: Instructional designer Fiona Quigs observes that “Shining light on failure actually changes it into a feedback process.” Sometimes we know we did something wrong, but figuring out the details can elude us without some help. Classmates and instructors can help to make sense of what went wrong, when, and how, so that improved strategies are developed and implemented in the next draft.
Correction: Steven Parker, in his criticism of the “cult of failure” in the business world, clarifies that experiencing failure isn’t the point. “You have to learn from failure, and apply what you learn to the next attempt. If you don’t, then there’s no path leading from repeated failures to success.” Taking action to enhance your work, based on your reflection on the experience and feedback received, is critical to learning from mistakes.
The classroom – online or on-ground – is the place for experimentation as a kind of proving ground where mistakes are analyzed and improved upon as the learner advances in the course. It’s not as acceptable when you get to the workplace, where the culture may be quite different, there is an expectation for success, and there’s more at stake in terms of resources and reputation. If a class project doesn’t go well, the ramifications aren’t on the same level as working with a client, for example, as a representative of your employer. College courses can foster learning from mistakes in a low-risk environment where resources and support are in place to propel us forward.
Think about mistakes you’ve made and failures you have overcome in your school and work life. How significant have these experiences been for your learning and skill development? How have others played a role in helping you learn from your mistakes?